Ben Tilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Bradley M. Kuhn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The FSF surely wants Perl to be under a GPL compatible license (and,
>> (GPL|SOMETHING) is always GPL-compatible, by default). I don't think
>> the FSF has ever expressed a desire that Perl be GPL-only. In fact,
>> the FSF has a policy of encouraging everyone to always dual-licensing
>> (GPL|Artistic) for Perl modules, to encourage uniformity, and avoid
>> licensing confusion for those who use lots of Perl modules.
> Could you point me at this policy?
<http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#PerlLicense>
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
