Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 11:42:32PM -0500, Uri Guttman wrote: >> SC> 5x slowdown. >> >> not if you just check a flag in the main loop. you only check the event >> system if you have pending events or signals, etc. the key is not >> checking all events on each pass thru the loop. > >Which is exactly what Chip did in his safe-signals patch. 33% slowdown. I don't believe it - can we add a stub test and bench mark it? -- Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Via, but not speaking for: Texas Instruments Ltd.
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Uri Guttman
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Dan Sugalski
- safe signals (was Re: perl ... Nicholas Clark
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... nick
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Uri Guttman
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Uri Guttman
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Dan Sugalski
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Dan Sugalski
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... nick
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was ... Bart Lateur
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Simon Cozens
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Uri Guttman
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... nick
- Re: perl IS an event loop (... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Speaking of signals... nick
- Re: Speaking of signals... Filipe Brandenburger
- Re: Speaking of signals... Damien Neil
- Re: Speaking of signals... Nicholas Clark