> Some of this ground does need to be revisited, since perl 6 isn't going to > be perl 5, and the tradeoffs are going to be different. (I'm still not sure > that checking for pending events every opcode is the way to go, either. > Piggybacking on the end of statement cleanup opcode might be a better > place, depending on how frequently that happens) That might also be a more logical place: then we could say that a statement is the 'atomic' unit. Yes, some statements take longer than others. Tough. -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- Re: Speaking of signals... Uri Guttman
- Re: Speaking of signals... Rocco Caputo
- Re: Speaking of signals... Dan Sugalski
- perl IS an event loop (was Re: Speaking of signals...) Uri Guttman
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was Re: Speaking of sign... Simon Cozens
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was Re: Speaking of ... Uri Guttman
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was Re: Speaking... Simon Cozens
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was Re: Speaking... Dan Sugalski
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was Re: Speaking... Simon Cozens
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was Re: Speaking... Dan Sugalski
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was Re: Speaking... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was Re: Speaking... Uri Guttman
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was Re: Speaking... Dan Sugalski
- safe signals (was Re: perl IS an event loop... Nicholas Clark
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was Re: Speaking... nick
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was Re: Speaking... Uri Guttman
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was Re: Speaking... Uri Guttman
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was Re: Speaking... Dan Sugalski
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was Re: Speaking... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was Re: Speaking... Dan Sugalski
- Re: perl IS an event loop (was Re: Speaking... nick