At 09:42 AM 1/2/01 -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote: >On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > > that got wedged into an 8K address space with overlays...) but I'm pretty > > sure I could do it on a PDP-11, with it's 64Kwords of I&D space. Probably > > not the baseline, all-C version of the source, but perl nonetheless. > >Oh, then perhaps we should put the PDP-11 memory model probes back >into Configure? :-) Nah--if I was going to do a RSTS/E port of perl, I'd rewrite most of the guts in assembly anyway, so there wouldn't be a whole lot of point... :) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: standard representations Damien Neil
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Andy Dougherty
- Re: standard representations Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Andy Dougherty
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Uri Guttman
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Uri Guttman
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Uri Guttman
- Re: standard representations Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: standard representations Uri Guttman
- Re: standard representations Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: standard representations Uri Guttman
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski