>Have you thought it through NOW, on a purely semantic level (in isolation >from implementation issues and historical precedent), I've said it before, and I'll say it again: you keep using the word "semantic", but I do not think you know what that word means. --tom
- Re: Perl 5's "non-greedy... Deven T. Corzine
- Re: Perl 5's "non-greedy&quo... Deven T. Corzine
- Re: Perl 5's "non-greedy... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Perl 5's "non-greedy... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Perl 5's "non-greedy... Deven T. Corzine
- Re: Perl 5's "non-greedy" matching c... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Perl 5's "non-greedy" matching can be TOO... brian d foy
- Re: Perl 5's "non-greedy" matching can b... Deven T. Corzine
- Re: Perl 5's "non-greedy" matching c... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Perl 5's "non-greedy" matchi... Deven T. Corzine
- Re: Perl 5's "non-greedy" ma... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Perl 5's "non-greedy" ma... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Perl 5's "non-greedy" matching c... Uri Guttman
- Re: Perl 5's "non-greedy" matching c... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Perl 5's "non-greedy" matching can be TOO... Nathan Wiger