On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 01:17:01PM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote: > We seem to be arguing about the best method for making it *im*possible > to use anything but the initially-chosen-implementation language to > implement perl. This feels like a bad thing. I don't see that; I see that we're all agreed that the initial design should be so general as to be language-independent. We all now seem to be arguing vigorously that the initial design should be so general as to be language-independent, which seems a little bit of a pointless exercise to me. Can we move on? -- `First Up Against The Wall When The Revolution Comes! Woohoo! So long as they promise to use latex gloves, I'm happy. :)' - Thorfinn, in the Monastery.
- Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Meta-design Nathan Torkington
- Re: Meta-design Dan Sugalski
- Re: Meta-design Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design... Sam Tregar
- Perl6 compatibility with non-C env... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Perl6 compatibility with n... Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl6 compatibility wi... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Perl6 compatibility wi... Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl6 compatibility with n... Sam Tregar
- Re: Perl6 compatibility wi... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl6 compatibility with n... Hildo Biersma
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design... Piers Cawley
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-d... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Me... Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-d... John Porter
- documenting interfaces (was Re: Meta-design... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Meta-design Roland Giersig
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark