On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 01:17:01PM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> We seem to be arguing about the best method for making it *im*possible
> to use anything but the initially-chosen-implementation language to
> implement perl. This feels like a bad thing.

I don't see that; I see that we're all agreed that the initial design should
be so general as to be language-independent. We all now seem to be arguing
vigorously that the initial design should be so general as to be
language-independent, which seems a little bit of a pointless exercise to me.
Can we move on?

-- 
`First Up Against The Wall When The Revolution Comes!  Woohoo!
So long as they promise to use latex gloves, I'm happy. :)'
 - Thorfinn, in the Monastery.

Reply via email to