Re: Guaranteed object destruction (was Re: Meta-design)

[Piers Cawley]

Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think I'd just as soon always call DESTROY in a predicable manner
> and not do *anything* perlish at GC time. If nothing else it means
> that we don't have to worry about having a valid perl context handy
> when the GC runs. (Since threading the thing is a possibility we
> might run into issues otherwise)

So objects that get caught up in a circular reference chain don't get
their DESTROYs called? I'm not sure I'd be up for that. In fact, I'm
sure I *wouldn't* be up for that. Or are we gonna still need 'use
WeakRef'? 

-- 
Piers