In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 10:18 AM 11/21/00 -0800, Benjamin Stuhl wrote: > > >Well, it would (IMHO) make more sense to have > >perl6_parse_script (I do tend to follow > >{subsystem,verb,object} naming...) > > Or Perl$parse_script, but that's a matter of taste, I suppose. :) Given that it isn't a valid C identifier, yes... Unless you're using VAXC or DECC of course, which was your point I assume ;-) Tom -- Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.compton.nu/ ...Discoveries are made by not following instructions.
- Re: To get things started... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: To get things started... Dan Sugalski
- Re: To get things started... Bart Lateur
- Re: To get things started... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: To get things started... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: To get things started... Steve Fink
- Re: To get things started... Dan Sugalski
- Re: To get things started... Steve Fink
- Re: To get things started... Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: To get things started... Dan Sugalski
- Re: To get things started... Tom Hughes
- Re: To get things started... Dan Sugalski
- Re: To get things started... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: To get things started... Tom Hughes
- Re: To get things started... David Grove
- Re: To get things started... Dan Sugalski
- Re: To get things started... David Grove
- Re: To get things started... Dan Sugalski
- Re: To get things started... David Grove
- Re: To get things started... David Grove