David Grove wrote: > > the interests of a small group overriding the interests of the whole, "the interests of the whole" is a mythical beast, especially on the net. > the creation of another perl-elite caste, etc. Nate, correct me if I have > it wrong PLEASE... So you trust some people to tell you this, and others you dismiss as conspirators? > lead the team to a unanymous decision. It can never happen. > team, the leader could be removed by majority appeal, but otherwise has > authority in that area, and could not override the group. With the groups > as a collective, general election of a core team was shot down We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week... Hope you get my point. -- John Porter
- Guidelines for internals proposals and documentation Dan Sugalski
- Re: Guidelines for internals proposals and documentati... Mike Lacey
- Re: Guidelines for internals proposals and documentati... Adam Turoff
- Re: Guidelines for internals proposals and documen... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Guidelines for internals proposals and doc... Adam Turoff
- Re: Guidelines for internals proposals and... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Guidelines for internals proposal... Adam Turoff
- Re: Guidelines for internals proposals and documen... David Grove
- Re: Guidelines for internals proposals and doc... Andy Dougherty
- Re: Guidelines for internals proposals and doc... John Porter
- Re: Guidelines for internals proposals and... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Guidelines for internals proposals and documentati... Ken Fox
- Re: Guidelines for internals proposals and documentati... John van V
- Re: Guidelines for internals proposals and documentati... David Grove
- Re: Guidelines for internals proposals and documentati... John van V