Re: virtual machine implementation options

[Steve Fink]

Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> 
> Some sort of SGI megaserver, dunno MHz, but load is high (more than
> five times the number of CPUs...), so the following numbers are a tad slow,
> but I guess relatively right:
> 
>                 -O3     none
> 
> switch           7.02    7.70
> orig            16.59   15.92
> naive           18.96   18.96
> hybrid          17.54   16.38
> linear          17.54   16.37
> predictable     21.89   20.53

Nice pessimizer. :-) But it couldn't compile the computed goto?