Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > not a good sign but we may need to take the hit to support overloading > any function and supporting TIL and threads. i think a %20 hit to get > those working cleanly might be a decent tradeoff. I don't. I'd find it to be a really good reason to learn Python. > the TIL speedup over pure interpretation might win that back and > more. If that's true, that's a different ballgame of course. If at all possible, Perl 6 should be *faster* than Perl 5. Perl is already too slow IMO. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Acceptable speeds (was Re: TIL red... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re: TIL... Uri Guttman
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re: TIL... Adam Turoff
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re: TIL... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re: TIL... Uri Guttman
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re: TIL... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re: TIL... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re: TIL... Steve Fink
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will t... John Porter
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will t... Uri Guttman
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will t... Russ Allbery
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will t... Simon Cozens
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will t... Uri Guttman
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will t... Adam Turoff
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will t... Uri Guttman
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? Jerrad Pierce
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? foo . bar