> Nathan Torkington wrote:
>
>> I'd rather not revisit this, or any other, RFC until Larry's had a
>> chance to *really* comment and put forward his suggestions.
>
> I think pitching renames for "local" is at least as worthwhile as
> pitching code names. How about "Hold?" It isn't listed in Blackstone's
> RFC 19, and it focuses on the restore-later aspects -- put that variable
> on hold, like it is a phone call, while you do something else with your
> ear.
>
Do I hear a volunteer to take over maintenance of one of my RFC's?
:)
He's right, it sure beats pitching code names.
If you're on -meta, David, you might have seen Larry's suggestion.
I don't think he was serious, but:
meanwhile our $foo;
Sounds good to me.
RFC 19 will not be updated.
jdb
