On Tuesday, October 10, 2000 3:27 PM, Simon Cozens [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Consider: > "Public Opinion": Hey, we need Perl 6 stable in three weeks. > Coders: But, uhm, we haven't started coding yet. Consider: Microsoft: We need Perl by April 15th Head Cheese: Ok, sure P5P: HuH??? "Public Opinion": HuH??? [Result: Perl 5.6 chaos] Consider: Microsoft: We need Perl by April 15th Head Cheese: Ok, sure P5P: HuH??? "Public Opinion": Bite me [Result: theoretical stable release at a proper time] Get real. No, offense, Dan. This isn't targeting you. I think you're starting to realize this now. At first, I think you thought I was.
- Re: Continued RFC process Will Coleda - IMG
- RE: Continued RFC process David Grove
- Re: Continued RFC process Simon Cozens
- Re: Continued RFC process Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Continued RFC process Simon Cozens
- RE: Continued RFC process Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Continued RFC process Nathan Wiger
- RE: Continued RFC process David Grove
- Re: Continued RFC process Will Coleda - IMG
- David's paranoia again (was Re: Continued RFC pro... Randal L. Schwartz
- RE: Continued RFC process David Grove
- RE: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- RE: Continued RFC process David Grove
- Re: Continued RFC process Russ Allbery
- RE: Continued RFC process Bryan C . Warnock
- RE: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process J. David Blackstone
- Re: Continued RFC process J. David Blackstone
- Re: Continued RFC process J. David Blackstone
- RE: Continued RFC process Glen