On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 10:50:06AM -0500, David Grove wrote:
> I don't know it's affiliations
You know that word "independent"? Should have been a give-away, but...
> but I _seem_ to recall (such a "seem" that it's about 10% away from a guess)
> that it's "owned" by either the independent perl mongers groups or one
> particular one. (I haven't
This is not true.
> What's to say (I'm building on a guess, here) that, if the Perl language was
> put into the hands of a committee, corporate interests wouldn't begin buying
> out its members, leaving Larry no control except as a figurehead with no
> authority to put a halt on nonsense?
ETOOPARANOID.
--
You are in a maze of little twisting passages, all alike.
