On Wednesday, October 04, 2000 4:15 AM, Tom Christiansen 
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> >POD, presumably.  Or maybe son-of-POD; it would be nice to have better
> >support for tables and lists.
>
> We did this for the camel.   Which, I remind the world, was
> written in pod.
>
> ''tom

Uh...

wow

seriously, that impresses me.

With that I reiterate my personal conclusions that playing too much funk with 
POD would be a disaster (including moving to something completely unpodly, like 
XML).

Tom... wow.

Is there anyway I could get the source for perusal? I'll supply O'Reilly with a 
copy of my book receipt to show that I own it. I want to see this in action.



Reply via email to