On Wednesday, October 04, 2000 4:15 AM, Tom Christiansen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > >POD, presumably. Or maybe son-of-POD; it would be nice to have better > >support for tables and lists. > > We did this for the camel. Which, I remind the world, was > written in pod. > > ''tom Uh... wow seriously, that impresses me. With that I reiterate my personal conclusions that playing too much funk with POD would be a disaster (including moving to something completely unpodly, like XML). Tom... wow. Is there anyway I could get the source for perusal? I'll supply O'Reilly with a copy of my book receipt to show that I own it. I want to see this in action.
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Myers, Dirk
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Garrett Goebel
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentat... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for docume... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for do... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... John Porter
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Garrett Goebel
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Greg Boug
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... David Grove
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentat... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentat... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for docume... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentat... Andrew Wilson