Adam Turoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I plan to offer a more formal RFC of this idea.
>
> Z.
>
> =item perl6storm #0101
>
> Just like the "use english" pragma (the modern not-yet-written
> version of "use English" module), make something for legible
> fileops.
>
> is_readable(file) is really -r(file)
Has unpleasant syntax saying "is_readable". Should be like normal
English predicates. Get the idea you do. Is better even the Lisp -p
convention!
What's wrong with doing it like I (and maybe a few others) speak, and
saying "readable(file)"? The "is_" prefix serves only to make
predicates impossible to read out, leading to thinkos.
[...]
--
Ariel Scolnicov |"GCAAGAATTGAACTGTAG" | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Compugen Ltd. |Tel: +972-2-5713025 (Jerusalem) \ We recycle all our Hz
72 Pinhas Rosen St. |Tel: +972-3-7658514 (Main office)`---------------------
Tel-Aviv 69512, ISRAEL |Fax: +972-3-7658555 http://3w.compugen.co.il/~ariels
