Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have no objection to -internals remaining. I think their discussion > will probably take off more after Larry's announcement. Personally I'm betting that the volume we've seen on -language will pale into tiny insignificance compared to the volume on -internals once Larry has made his announcement. -- Piers
- Update on the RFC Process Adam Turoff
- Re: Update on the RFC Process Nathan Torkington
- Re: Update on the RFC Process Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Update on the RFC Process Nathan Torkington
- Re: Update on the RFC Process Piers Cawley
- Re: Update on the RFC Process Simon Cozens
- Re: Update on the RFC Process Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Update on the RFC Process Adam Turoff
- Re: Update on the RFC Process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Update on the RFC Process Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Update on the RFC Process Bradley M. Kuhn