Greg Williams wrote: > as I remember, the C<no scope;> pragma, when used, would simply act as if the >enclosing scope were not in place, enabling such things as: > if ($ints) { > no scope; > use integer; > } Hmm. C<no scope> could be implemented in terms of the rfc 340 C<with> like so: $scope_out_here = with; if ($ints) { with $scope_out_here {use integer} }; C<caller> is about subroutine calls. -- David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "After jotting these points down, we felt better."
- RFC 339 (v1) caller->eval BLOCK Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 339 (v1) caller->eval BLOCK Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 339 (v1) caller->eval BLOCK David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 339 (v1) caller->eval BLOCK Greg Williams