Re: Pulling RFC 161

[Nathan Wiger]

Bennett Todd wrote:
> 
> If the only grounds is lack of interest, please just freeze it. It
> can be tossed later if people turn up strong counterarguments, like
> difficulting keeping the language's semantics intact or difficulty
> delivering better performance than perl5.

I agree. I haven't heard any counterarguments other than speed. If any
of the -internals claims hold up, that won't even be an issue, in which
case this is a good idea.

-Nate