> >I propose that the existing C<format> mechanism be removed from Perl 6 > >and be replaced with a pragma-induced add-in function, based on > >the semantics of C<Text::Autoformat::form>, as described in > >the following sections. > > Can you please explain what's the difference between a module and a > pragma, and more particular, why it is important that this would become > a pragma? Should be a standard module not a pragma. I'll excise that remnant of an earlier version in the next draft. Thanks. Damian
- Re: RFC 230 (v1) Replace C<format> built-in with pr... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 230 (v1) Replace C<format> built-in with pr... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 230 (v1) Replace C<format> built-in wi... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 230 (v1) Replace C<format> built-i... H . Merijn Brand
- Re: RFC 230 (v1) Replace C<format> built-i... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 230 (v1) Replace C<format> built-in with pr... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 230 (v1) Replace C<format> built-in with pr... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 230 (v1) Replace C<format> built-in with pr... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 230 (v1) Replace C<format> built-in wi... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 230 (v1) Replace C<format> built-in with pr... Bart Lateur
- Damian Conway