Andy Dougherty wrote: > > How do you turn it off? I want to keep a way to specify stuff without any > interpolation whatsoever. I see the usefulness of this sort of quoting, > but I also see the usefulness of being absolutely able to turn all > interpolation off. Yes, I agree with this point, also raise by Glenn and others. Currently, there is very nice semantics in shell-style quoting: q// == '' == *NO* interpolation If we want a quasi-interpolated environment, I say we add qs// for "Single quotes with Some interpolation". I suspect once \I and \E catch on, people are going to be asking for others, and then pretty soon q// will not be much less interpolated than qq//. I think Perl *needs* a NO interpolation quoting contruct, and q// fits the bill quite nicely, as-is. I say a new one should be proposed that can handle these new quasi-interpolated semantics. -Nate
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in sin... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in sin... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single quoti... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single quoti... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single quoti... Andy Dougherty
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in sin... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single quoti... Brad Hughes