On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 12:23:25PM +0200, Bart Lateur wrote: > On 19 Sep 2000 19:41:20 -0000, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote: > >Perl should come distributed with more modules. > > I know of people/sites where installing the whole lot of Perl just to > run a tiny script, is not acceptable as an option. Please read the entire RFC before responding. Note the section on breaking up the distribution into smaller pieces. -- Michael G Schwern http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just Another Stupid Consultant Perl6 Kwalitee Ashuranse But honestly, the more expensive the better. Just depend on how much you trust us. --Alex Chiu, Immortality Guy
- Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modul... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Curtis Jewell
- Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Andy Dougherty
- Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Andy Dougherty
- Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Andy Dougherty
- Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Bart Lateur
- RE: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Michael G Schwern
- RE: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Garrett Goebel
- RE: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Garrett Goebel
- Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Nathan V. Patwardhan
- Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Andy Dougherty
- Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Prymmer/Kahn
- Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Chaim Frenkel
- RE: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Garrett Goebel
- Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules Tom Christiansen