On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 11:40:47AM -0400, John Porter wrote:
> Simon Cozens wrote:
> >
> > (The deadline for collecting ideas passed two weeks ago. Why is this all
> > still going on?)
>
> Because there are still many worthy ideas which have not surfaced yet.
>
> Which is the higher priority?
I know, I know, but someone has to push things to a conclusion or the talking
will never stop.
There'll *always* be more worthy ideas. Do we suspend coding indefinitely?
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 09:51:29AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> Simon Cozens writes:
> > (The deadline for collecting ideas passed two weeks ago. Why is this all
> > still going on?)
>
> What deadline are you talking about?
http://www.perl.org/perl6/:
Schedule YAPC::UK Meeting Aug 18, 2000
compile external comments Sept 1, 2000
"Compile external comments" is a hugely cryptic phrase, but I suspect that
refers to the public RFC process, doesn't it? I thought the idea was, we send
everything off to Larry *then*, and
language spec draft Oct 14, 2000
he chews over it all and comes back with a draft language spec.
Did someone schedule the YAPC::Europe meeting? I asked about it here and on
the Y::E mailing list, but it still doesn't appear on the schedule which is on
the web page.
--
"Consider a spherical bear, in simple harmonic motion..."
-- Professor in the UCB physics department
