>What I said was: making length(@array) "work" would be catering to >novice people *coming from C*. We shouldn't. Not that much. In Perl, a >string is not an array. I'm pretty sure it's not just the people coming from C who expect this. This all points to the bug^H^H^Hdubious feature which is the sub($) context template as applied to named arrays and hashes. Requiring an explicit conversion would help a lot. Or so it seems. --tom
- Re: Uninitialized value warni... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) w... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) work Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) work Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) work Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) work Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) work Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) work Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) work Dave Storrs
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) work Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) work Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) w... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@arr... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) work Dave Storrs