> 'foo'->bar($baz)
>
> looks visually clattered, but C<<foo()->bar($baz)>> looks as if it expresses
> its meaning. The default choice is done so that if you need other
> choice, your code does not look artificial.
Hear, hear!
> foo->bar($baz, $coon)
>
> should be made synonymous with
>
> foo->bar $baz, $coon
>
> I can see no ambiguity in this call, but it not always works with Perl5.
But [proposal:] Method calls should respect prototypes just like normal subs.
So that if bar is prototyped as bar($$), then the call is parsed as
foo->bar($baz), $coon
--
John Porter
We're building the house of the future together.
