I'm happy with this solution, it seems to address everyone's needs. -Nate Michael G Schwern wrote: > > I'd say: > > 1) << does what it does now mod RFC 111 (ie. you can put whitespace in the > terminator, but it doesn't effect anything) > > 2) <<< does (e).
- Re: Drop here docs altogether?... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Drop here docs altogether?... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Termina... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Ter... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Ter... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Ter... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Ter... Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Ter... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Ter... Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Ter... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Ter... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Ter... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Ter... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Ter... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Ter... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Ter... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Termina... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Terminators (Was Whitespace a... H . Merijn Brand
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Terminators (Was Whitespace a... Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Terminators (Was Whitespace a... Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 111 (v3) Here Docs Terminators (Was Whitespace a... Eric Roode