>I think it's far more inconsistent to have the above work but not have >methods interpolate. And yes, I realize they're different thingies but >they're very close syntactically and cognitively, Funny--I always think of them as function calls, and don't expect function calls to expand. >especially for data >access (which is really what we're talking about here). --tom
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method calls Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method ... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of met... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of met... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of met... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of method ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of met... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of met... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC - Interpolation of met... Nathan Wiger