>> I just think it's a case of "crying wolf", especially when other >> people's CPAN modules start spewing this stuff out from perfectly >> reasonable code, filling up your web error logs with "uninitialized this >> and that". As a sysadmin, that pisses me off. :-( >Much of your problem has been solved through lexical warnings. That's very true. People who globally enable warnings in code that isn't their own get precisely what they've asked for. 'Twas for this that lexical warnings were invented--amongst other things. Don't write #!/usr/bin/perl -w when you mean use warnings; As these are *not* the same thing. --tom
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@arr... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) w... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@arr... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(... Randal L. Schwartz
- Uninitialized value warnings ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Uninitialized value warni... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Uninitialized value warni... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Uninitialized value warni... Michael Fowler
- Re: Uninitialized value warni... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Uninitialized value warni... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Uninitialized value warni... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) w... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) work Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) work Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) work Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) work Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) work Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) work Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 212 (v1) Make length(@array) work Dave Storrs