Adam Turoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 08:47:11AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> > > That *shouldn't* be hard. If you're getting hung up on details like
> > > =over 4, =item, L<> and C<>, then leave them out.
> >
> > No, I'm getting hung up on the fact that it'll take a bunch of time to
> > flesh out the RFCs beyond a simple TITLE and ABSTRACT and I want to
> > get the idea on the table before the deadline.
>
> Then what's wrong with Nat's proposal?
The question of whether it'll count as being on the table in time for
the language (sub)group's cut off date for new RFCs.
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 10:18:41AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> >
> > Why do you need to do this? Just post with a subject line like:
> >
> > IDEA: All Perl keywords should be in UPPER CASE
> >
> > and watch the shooting begin. Anything that survives this phase
> > can be RFCed.
