Hi Ilya, I have three questions about your RFC: Firstly does your proposal allow for a slice like 10..20:2 (i.e. with a stride of 2) ? If not is there an easy way to incorporate that? Secondly, what about having multidim support in the core so that the tie-tokenisers get optimised away? i.e. would we be able to say something like: @x = @y[10..20; 1..3] for core arrays Finally as an overload expert what do you think about the proposals to make arrays overloadable objects so one can say things like: @x = 3 * @y; Katl
- RFC 231 (v1) Data: Multi-dimensional arrays/hashes and... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: Multi-dimensional arrays/h... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: Multi-dimensional arra... Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: Multi-dimensional ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: Multi-dimensio... Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: Multi-dim... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: Multi... Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: M... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: M... Christian Soeller
- Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: M... Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: M... Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: M... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: M... Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: M... Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: M... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: M... Christian Soeller
- Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: M... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: M... Ilya Zakharevich