On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:04:50PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 01:15 AM 9/15/00 -0400, Adam Turoff wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 10:37:40PM -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> > > I vaguely recall when Chip put that in. He worked pretty hard to
> > > adjust the command line/#! option processing. (Something about
> > > unsafe operations already being done before the script is read.)
> >
> >The crux of my proposal/request is that when perl6 innards are
> >designed, -T processing is handled the same way -p and -i are.
> >That is, option processing should start out cleaner than what
> >is in 5.7.0 or what was in 5.004 (at least, wrt -T).
> 
> Maybe we should come up with a precedence list for switches. You'd want -T 
> in the #! line processed before the -M on the command-line in this case, 
> for example.

DING!  You just won the "Help Improve RFC 227" contest.  Mind if I steal
that thought for v2?

And where do things like -d and -c fall into the precedence list?  I
think that -c should be pretty high, but fall after -M, but -d should
be pretty low, possibly lowest of all.

Z.

Reply via email to