Re: RFC 214 (v1) Emit warnings and errors based on unoptimized code

[Nathan Torkington]

Dan Sugalski writes:
> No, that's the point. But if someone explicitly strips out the debugging 
> info then, well, you don't get much help in debugging, now do you? :)

I buy that.  It'd be nice to be able to be one step better than C,
though, and given *something* that you can use to go back to your
source from.

Nat