Chris Nandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's just silly. None of those issues were around when the BSD and > MIT licenses were penned. They are very simple licenses that most any > reasonable person could have written. I think it's pretty obvious from the wording of both of those licenses that they were written by lawyers given initial instructions on what the licenses should say. > None of them could cite chapter and verse what the issues are that you > are referring to, because those issues were not around back then. Neither of those licenses are trying to do anything nearly as complex as the AL is. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: An attempt to be constructi... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Ben Tilly
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Ben Tilly
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Chris Nandor
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Ben Tilly
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Chris Nandor
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Ben Tilly
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Chris Nandor
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Russ Allbery
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Ben Tilly
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Chris Nandor
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Ben Tilly
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Chris Nandor
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Ben Tilly
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Chris Nandor
- RE: An attempt to be constructive Fisher Mark
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Ben Tilly