On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 11:46:31AM -0400, 'John Porter' wrote: > Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > > In the other camp, C<yield> has been suggested; but > > > the conflation of that with its thread-related semantics may not > > > be a such good idea. > > > > C<pass>. > > Well, "pass" might be o.k.; but it usually means something going > *into* a sub, not coming out... I'll pass that remark. -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) Steve Fink
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) 'John Porter'
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) 'John Porter'
- RE: $a in @b (RFC 199) Garrett Goebel
- RE: $a in @b (RFC 199) Garrett Goebel
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) David L. Nicol
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) 'John Porter'
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) 'John Porter'
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) Tom Christiansen
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) David L. Nicol
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) John Porter
- RE: $a in @b (RFC 199) Garrett Goebel
- RE: $a in @b (RFC 199) Garrett Goebel
- Re: $a in @b (RFC 199) Tom Christiansen
- RE: $a in @b (RFC 199) Garrett Goebel