Russ Allbery wrote: > > I've been feeling guilty about not doing much in the way of chair-like > things with date-time, but I'm also not sure what exactly I'm supposed to > be doing. Discussion has essentially died out completely, which means > that I probably should be trying to kick-start it. And I'll be hitting the list with two more RFC's by the end of the week, so you're not out of the woods yet... ;-) -Nate
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... John Porter
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Mark-Jason Dominus
- What good are WG chairs? Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: What good are WG chairs? Russ Allbery
- Seems to me that -- Nathan Wiger
- Seems to me that -- Mike Lacey
- Re: Seems to me that -- Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Adam Turoff
- Update: Wrapping up -data RFC... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Update: Wrapping up -data... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implementations - Seperating th... skud
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implementations - Seperating th... skud
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implementations - Seperati... Michael G Schwern