>>>>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DS> I'd definitely rather perl not do any sort of explicit user-level locking. DS> That's not our job, and there be dragons. Please explain how this is possible? Does this mean that without user specifying a lock, perl will allow a chaotic update pattern to be visible to the user? thread A thread B push(@foo, $bar); ++$bar; or $foo{$bar} = $baz; delete $foo{$bar++}; Will there be some sort of coherence here? <chaim> -- Chaim Frenkel Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
- RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Steven W McDougall
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Thr... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight... Steven W McDougall
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightwe... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightwe... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightwe... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightwe... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightwe... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightwe... Alan Burlison
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightwe... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightwe... Alan Burlison