Shoot chop. and chomp. Unless you add unchop and unchomp. Parity issue. Like
a language with YES and no NO.
Just kill then both.
>From: Bryan C. Warnock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: RFC 195 (v1) Retire chop().
>Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 21:55:49 -0400
>
>On Thu, 07 Sep 2000, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > Awww, does this mean we won't be seeing chip() and chimp() in Perl 6?
>
>Someone, (and I've lost who, exactly) was interested in taking those
>off my hands for a String::Utils module.
>
>I believe it was quite clear, however, that my root-and-measure-derived
>naming convention would be replaced with something a little more...
>Anglican.
>
>So yes, but no. Or no, but yes, since the question was asked in the
>negative.
>
> --
>Bryan C. Warnock
>([EMAIL PROTECTED])
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
