On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 08:20:42PM +0100, Richard Proctor wrote: > I think what is needed is something along the line of : > > $re = qz{ '(' \$re ')' > | \$re \$re > | [^()]+ > }; > > Where qz is some hypothetical new quoting syntax How about qy() for Quote Yacc :-) This stuff is starting to look more and more like we're trying to fold lex and yacc into perl. We already have lex through (?{code}) in REs, but we have to hand-write our own yacc-a-likes. -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... Michael Maraist
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... Bart Lateur
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... David L. Nicol
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... Richard Proctor
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... Michael Maraist
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... Hugo
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... Hugo
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ... David Corbin
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Jonathan Scott Duff