>I think that's the idea... and print may return undef if it fails to >print, and the printed string otherwise (always defined, even if it's an >emtpy string). Those are not the semantics of print. It returns true (1) if successful, and false (undef) otherwise. You cannot change that. If I write print "0", it bloody well shan't be returning false. And what are you going to do about buffering? What do you *REALLY* want to do??? --tom
- RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print operator Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print operator Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print oper... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a pr... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should ... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl sho... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl sho... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl sho... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl sho... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl sho... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl sho... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a pr... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a pr... Jon Ericson