>I don't want that to change. I simply want that return (I'm not sure >how to phrase this) be able to return only a scalar or an aggregate. die unless wantarray; >It should be immune from having a scalar context pushed through from >the caller and change the commas from a list seperator into the comma >operator. Ok, how are you going to jam a list into a place that only holds a single thing? Modulo some superpositional silliness, you aren't. You need a rule for what to do. We have a rule for that, but you don't like it. It's not sensible that this rule be applied inconsistently. --tom
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Tom Christiansen
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Christopher J. Madsen
- do BLOCK as inline sub? (was Re: "... Uri Guttman
- Re: The distinction between "do BLOCK while CON... Peter Scott
- Re: The distinction between "do BLOCK whil... Christopher J. Madsen
- Re: The distinction between "do BLOCK ... Peter Scott
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Tom Christiansen
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Tom Christiansen
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Tom Christiansen
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Tom Christiansen
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Tom Christiansen
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Tom Christiansen
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Tom Christiansen
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Peter Scott
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Tom Christiansen