At 08:28 PM 8/31/00 -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote: >Larry Wall wrote: > > > > More generally, for all X, I wouldn't mind > > if Perl became the language of choice for X. > >Who wouldn't! > >But I think that would probably have to be, "if Perl became the language >of choice for X - 1". > >Perl's gotta be written in something, after all... ;-) Other than the bootstrap issue and the speed issue, what's wrong with that? I'd rather write a parser in perl than pretty much anything else. (Well, OK, maybe SNOBOL, but...) Most C compilers are written in C, and if we can get perl emitting native code... Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Bart Lateur
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... c . soeller
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Larry Wall
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Damian Conway
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Christian Soeller
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Damian Conway
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Dan Sugalski
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Damian Conway
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicing Buddha Buck
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicing Jeremy Howard
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicing Nathan Wiger