Re: A tentative list of vtable functions

[Bradley M. Kuhn]

Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 04:59 PM 8/31/00 -0400, Buddha Buck wrote:
> >At 04:43 PM 8/31/00 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >>Okay, here's a list of functions I think should go into variable vtables. 
> >>Functions marked with a * will take an optional type offset so we can 
> >>handle asking for various permutations of the basic type.
> >
> >Perhaps I'm missing something...  Is this for scalars alone?  I see no 
> >arrays/hashes here.
> 
> Gah. It's supposed to be for all types. I'll dredge together the bits for 
> arrays and hashes and wedge them in too.

Why not make the scalar, array, and hash vtables each be separate RFCs?  Or,
am I over-engineering the problem?

-- 
Bradley M. Kuhn  -  http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn

PGP signature