Michael Fowler wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 11:41:47AM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote: > > Michael Fowler wrote: > > > > > > my Dog $spot; # $spot is now a blessed Dog object > > > $spot->name("Fido"); # $spot->{'name'} eq "Fido" > > > > > > print ref $spot; # yes, "Dog" > > > > > > $spot = new Dalmation; # now $spot is a Dalmation object > > > > Yes, but the Dalmation $spot will *not* have the name "Fido," will it? > > Nope, $spot is now an entirely new object. Well then, that makes this example rather wasteful, doesn't it? my Dog $spot; if ($input eq 'Collie') { $spot = Collie->new; } elsif ($input eq 'Dalmation') { $spot = Dalmation->new; } Becuase we're creating two objects when we really only want one. David
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot shoul... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot s... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot s... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should call a cons... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should call a ... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should cal... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot shoul... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should call a ... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should cal... David E. Wheeler
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot shoul... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot s... David E. Wheeler
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot s... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot s... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot s... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot s... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should call a cons... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should call a ... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should cal... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should call a constructor i... Slaven Rezic
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should call a construc... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should call a cons... Piers Cawley