Duck & cover Nate- I sugested that weeks ago and the flames are just dying down in my mailbox.. It'll be an interesting experiement in "community behavior" however. If your proposal is widely acclaimed or even seriously considered, while mine was summarily dismissed, then it may be safe to assume that ideas aren't considered on merit, but instead on who is the submittor. -Ed >From: Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Proposal: chop() dropped >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:31:00 -0600 (MDT) > >chomp() is best used for chop()s main raison d'etre, removing $/ >from a string. I say we drop chop(). > >Nat _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.
- Proposal: chop() dropped Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
- RE: Proposal: chop() dropped Al
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Nathan Wiger
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Bart Lateur
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped skud
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Ed Mills
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Peter Scott
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Jonathan Scott Duff
- RE: Proposal: chop() dropped Eric Roode
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Eric Roode
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Dan Zetterstrom
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Dan Zetterstrom