On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, David L. Nicol wrote: > Perl looks, and AFAIK has always looked, like "C plus lune noise" to > many people. I think Perl looks like "C plus moon noise" to former C programmers. I imagine some people see it and think "Csh plus Awk noise". Perl is a lot more than C-with-scalars. > strong typing C's typing is not particularily strong. Witness the common abuse of "(void *)". Witness enums that are all compatible with integers. If we want strong typing (I don't) there are better places to look. > run-time efficiency C doesn't get run-time efficiency from its syntax, so we can't really expect to get anything here. It gets it from its compilation architecture. If you want to build a Perl frontend for GCC I think you might find a way leverage C's efficiency but you won't get it just by accepting C syntax. -sam
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Andy Dougherty
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Bryan C . Warnock
- the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT David Corbin
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- RE: the C JIT Sam Tregar
- RE: the C JIT David Olbersen
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Nathan Wiger
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Nathan Wiger
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Nathan Wiger
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Nathan Wiger
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol