Re: n-dim matrices

[Karl Glazebrook]

Buddha Buck wrote:
> 
> At 08:10 AM 9/1/00 +1200, Christian Soeller wrote:
> 
> >No, at least 18. One more piece of semantics that would be appreciated
> >is optional omission of trailing dimensions in slices, e.g. for a 3-dim
> >@a:
> >
> >   @a[0:1] == @a[0:1;] == @a[0:1;;]
> 
> Would you go for:
> 
> @a[$first;*];
> @a[*;$last];
> @a[$first;*;$last]?
> 
> Say yes, and I'll add it tonight!
> 
> I'm unsure if @a[*;$middle;*] has any reasonable interpretation.
> 
> >  Christian

Re:

@a[0:1;;]

@a[0;1;*]

It would be good if both were allowed.

Karl