> I am unemcumbered by any knowledge of the regex engine implementation, Yeah. But I do know something about it, and I have already expressed my informed opinion. Having you come along to say that you don't know anything about it at all, but that you nevertheless think I am mistaken, is bizarre. > It might be possible to unroll this imagined inner test outside the loop - Perhaps you could study the code in regexec.c for a little bit of time, say fifteen minutes, and then make this suggestion again in light of what you discover. I have no problem with discussing this in more detail, but I don't think it would be a good use of my time to discuss it with you when you haven't looked at the code.
- RFC 72 (v1) The regexp engine should go backward as we... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 72 (v2) The regexp engine should go backw... mike mulligan
- Re: RFC 72 (v1) The regexp engine should go backw... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 72 (v1) The regexp engine should go b... mike mulligan
- Re: RFC 72 (v1) The regexp engine should ... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 72 (v1) The regexp engine sho... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 72 (v1) The regexp engine should go b... Peter Heslin
- Re: RFC 72 (v3) Variable-length lookbehin... mike mulligan
- Re: RFC 72 (v3) Variable-length lookb... Hugo
- Re: RFC 72 (v3) Variable-length ... mike mulligan
- Re: RFC 72 (v3) Variable-length ... Hugo
- Re: RFC 72 (v3) Variable-len... mike mulligan
- Re: RFC 72 (v3) Variable-len... Hugo
- Re: RFC 72 (v1) The regexp engine should ... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 72 (v1) The regexp engine should ... Mark-Jason Dominus