Baris wrote: > >We're talking about how we'll write Perl 6 programs, not PDL programs. We > >need to ensure that the syntax we create is Perlish. > Aggreed. > But there is nothing wrong with making the syntax user friendly, or am I > totally missing what perl is? Perl is user-friendly to Perl users. Making it look more like Matlab (or any other numeric programming environment) and less like Perl is unfriendly to users. -data proposals need to fit with the rest of the language. For instance, if you really think that arrays should be able to be indexed by whitespace separated indices, this syntax really should be made to work with any list. Proposing this then requires thinking through all of the implications that this would involve.
- Re: n-dim matrices Karl Glazebrook
- Re: n-dim matrices Jeremy Howard
- Re: n-dim matrices Dan Sugalski
- Re: n-dim matrices Jeremy Howard
- Re: n-dim matrices Baris
- Re: n-dim matrices Buddha Buck
- Re: n-dim matrices Baris
- Designing Perl 6 data crunchin... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Designing Perl 6 data crun... Christian Soeller
- Re: Designing Perl 6 data crun... Baris
- Re: Designing Perl 6 data crun... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Designing Perl 6 data crun... Baris
- Re: Designing Perl 6 data crun... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Designing Perl 6 data crun... Christian Soeller
- Re: Designing Perl 6 data crun... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: n-dim matrices Baris
- a syntax derived from constant-time has... David L. Nicol
- Re: a syntax derived from constant... Nathan Wiger
- Re: a syntax derived from cons... David L. Nicol
- Re: a syntax derived from cons... Nathan Wiger
- Re: a syntax derived from cons... David L. Nicol