At 12:57 PM 8/29/00 -0500, David L. Nicol wrote: >I'd like to see every number bundled with a "precision" attribute. It's >a holdover from when I was heavily into chemistry. Some of the other RFCs on the list also appear to have been triggered the same way. Oh, wait... :-) -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies
- Re: ... as a term Larry Wall
- Re: ... as a term Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Larry Wall
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: Do we really need eq? Steve Simmons
- Re: Do we really need eq? John Porter
- Re: Do we really need eq? David L. Nicol
- Re: Do we really need eq? Peter Scott
- Re: Do we really need eq? Tom Christiansen
- Re: Do we really need eq? Andy Dougherty
- attributes definable as well as value... David L. Nicol
- Re: Do we really need eq? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Do we really need eq? Lipscomb, Al
- Re: Do we really need eq? Nathan Wiger
- RE: Do we really need eq? Fisher Mark
- Re: Do we really need eq? David L. Nicol
- Re: Do we really need eq? Dan Sugalski