Re: New variable type: matrix

[Nathan Wiger]

Christian Soeller wrote:
>
> The other problem with arrays is: how do we deal with functions that
> take multiple piddle arguments if they are arrays:
> 
>    @result = integrate @x, @y, @bounds;
> 
> Won't those all be clumped into one big input array?

This should be overrideable by prototypes. And the internals guys are
probably going to fix the "list-flattening problem" anyways. So I
wouldn't worry about this part.

-Nate